Summary
While building and working with the njelections package, I’ve found that a number of official results at the municipal level are probably (and in some cases, clearly) wrong 1 In each case, the error appears to be that the results from alphabetically adjacent towns are transposed. So far, I’ve found three examples of this:
- In the 2005 NJ Governor race, the results for Egg Harbor City, Egg Harbor Township, and Estell Manor appear to be scrambled.
- In the 2006 US Senate rate, the results for Egg Harbor City and Egg Harbor Township appear to be transposed.
- In the 2013 NJ Governor race, the results for Trenton and Robbinsville appear to be partially transposed.
In the following sections, I’ll explain why I think the official results are wrong, and how I suspect they should be fixed.
Egg Harbor City, Egg Harbor Township, and Estell Manor, 2005-2006
Before I get to the incorrect results in 2005 and 2006, let’s take a look at how these three towns usually vote. Here are the official results for the 2009 NJ Governor’s race, which I have no reason to suspect are incorrect:
year | municipality | population | office | Democratic | Republican | Third Party |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | Egg Harbor City | 4243 | Governor | 576 | 520 | 85 |
2009 | Egg Harbor township | 43323 | Governor | 4236 | 5795 | 729 |
2009 | Estell Manor | 1735 | Governor | 264 | 451 | 74 |
Egg Harbor township is by far the largest town, and has larger vote totals across the board. Egg Harbor city is larger than Estell Manor and more Democratic.
2005 NJ Governor race: Egg Harbor City, Egg Harbor township, and Estell Manor City
Now let’s take a look at the 2005 Governor’s race. Here are the official results:
year | municipality | office | Democratic | Republican | Third Party |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | Egg Harbor City | Governor | 4202 | 409 | 309 |
2005 | Egg Harbor township | Governor | 532 | 382 | 40 |
2005 | Estell Manor | Governor | 291 | 4187 | 78 |
Clearly, these results cannot be correct. The Republican vote in Estell Manor, for example, exceeds the population by a factor of more than 2.
My suspicion is that the results are shuffled, and the correct results should look like this:year | municipality | Democratic | Republican | Third Party |
---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | Egg Harbor City | 532 | 409 | 78 |
2005 | Egg Harbor township | 4202 | 4187 | 309 |
2005 | Estell Manor | 291 | 382 | 40 |
The corrected third party vote for the two smaller towns is a bit of guesswork. The third party vote in Egg Harbor City usually runs ahead of the third party vote in the smaller Estell Manor, so this guess is reasonable. On the other hand, I have lumped together all third party candidates, under the assumption that they were swapped as a group, which is far from certain.
2006 US Senate Race: Egg Harbor City and Egg Harbor township
Now let’s turn to the 2006 Senate rate. Here are the official results:year | municipality | office | Democratic | Republican | Third Party |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | Egg Harbor City | Senate | 4385 | 4938 | 230 |
2006 | Egg Harbor township | Senate | 609 | 531 | 34 |
2006 | Estell Manor | Senate | 305 | 371 | 20 |
In this case, the Estell Manor results seem very plausible, while the results from Egg Harbor City and Egg Harbor township seem to have swapped.
I suspect the correct results should look like this:year | municipality | office | Democratic | Republican | Third Party |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | Egg Harbor City | Senate | 609 | 531 | 34 |
2006 | Egg Harbor township | Senate | 4385 | 4938 | 230 |
2006 | Estell Manor | Senate | 305 | 371 | 20 |
Evidently, these three towns are difficult to keep straight! One might wonder if this is the only time the results have been scrambled. Fortunately, 2005 (Governor) and 2006 (Senate) seem to be the only election years between 2004 and 2021 which stand out as having a clear mistake:
2013 NJ Governor’s race, Trenton and Robbinsville
Initial results
New Jersey released the official results for Mercer County twice. Here is how the results were initially released:year | municipality | office | Democratic | Republican | Third Party |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | Robbinsville | Governor | 9179 | 2102 | 136 |
2013 | Trenton | Governor | 1228 | 3035 | 77 |
The Democratic vote stands out as clearly incorrect – Trenton is large and Democratic, while Robbinsville is small and Republican. But the Republican and Third party votes are also out of character.
Revised results
In the revised (and current) official results, the Democratic votes for Trenton and Robbinsville are swapped:year | municipality | office | Democratic | Republican | Third Party |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | Robbinsville | Governor | 1228 | 2102 | 136 |
2013 | Trenton | Governor | 9179 | 3035 | 77 |
This is more plausible, but leaves the at least somewhat out-of-character Republican and third-party vote in place.
Proposed changes
I suspect that in the initial results, all of the vote counts – not just the Democratic ones – in Robbinsville and Trenton were transposed. Here are my suggested fixes:year | municipality | office | Democratic | Republican | Third Party |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | Robbinsville | Governor | 1228 | 3035 | 77 |
2013 | Trenton | Governor | 9179 | 2102 | 136 |
If you make this change, the 2013 vote for both towns is more in character for with previous and subsequent elections:
Robbinsville township name change
In the case of Robbinsville and Trenton, there is a fairly plausible mechanism for how the the votes could have been transposed: Between the 2009 and 2013 NJ Governor elections, the township changed its official name from Washington to Robbinsville, and as a result, Trenton and Washington/Robbinsville switched positions in a alphabetic listing of Mercer County towns.
If you think that is too trivial a consideration to affect a the official tally of the NJ Governor’s election, I would like to direct your attention to the PDFs of the official results.
Here is how that list appears in 2009. Notice that the list is alphabetized, with “Washington Twp.” appearing just after “Trenton City”. All townships have the “Twp.” suffix.
And now the same list in 2013. You would expect to see “Robbinsville Twp.” just before “Trenton City”. Instead, “Twp.” is prepended to “Robbinsville”, allowing the township to appear in the same position in the list, just after Trenton.
Lucky thing it wasn’t a borough.
Anyway, I have sympathy. Dealing with heterogeneous data sets from multiple sources is hard.
Currently, the njelections package always uses official results.↩︎